Back to Newsroom
A scanner repeatedly fails to read a barcode on a high-cost tissue package, forcing a nurse to manually type long character strings into the EHR. A specialized product arrives in the room that isn't in the hospital’s item master, so it never gets flagged for billing. Meanwhile, expired products sit undetected on storage shelves because inventory depletion records don't match what was actually consumed.
None of these moments make headlines on their own. But left unaddressed, they cascade across the entire healthcare value chain — creating clinical friction at the bedside, inventory inaccuracies for supply chain, and missed revenue for finance.
All of these downstream operations depend on a single, crucial moment: capturing accurate product usage right at the point of care.
Inefficient documentation workflows result in incomplete data
The issue isn’t a lack of effort from frontline teams; it’s that traditional methods — manual entry, barcode scanning, and paper logs — were not built for the fast-paced reality of modern ORs and procedural areas.
Across the healthcare organizations AssistIQ works with, error and omission rates in workflows reliant on manual documentation regularly reached up to 50%. When documentation falls short at the point of care, every team paying attention downstream feels the impact:
- Clinical teams spend critical cognitive bandwidth on documentation, which takes away time from patient care.
- Supply chain teams operate with distorted inventory depletion data, which can lead to stockouts, excess stock, unbudgeted waste, and slow response times during product recalls.
- Revenue integrity and finance teams suffer from missed charges and hours spent chasing down clinicians long after cases end to reconcile conflicting records.
What we're hearing from clinical leaders
Margin pressure is intense, and because surgical and procedural suites drive up to 70% of hospital revenue, perioperative performance is directly under the microscope. In recent conversations with perioperative and procedural leaders, three operational imperatives continually surface:
- Workforce relief is non-negotiable: Nurses and techs want to spend less time managing software screens and more time caring for patients. As one perioperative director shared: "Getting nurses away from the supply screen and back to anticipating what's next in the room—that's the biggest win."
- Integration must be seamless: New technologies cannot be point-solutions that fail to integrate with EHR, ERP, and other existing systems and workflows. As another leader emphasized: "If it doesn't integrate natively into our existing tools and work for our frontline people, it won't scale."
- Current product capture rates are unacceptable: Despite investments in barcode scanners and complex point-of-use systems, leaders know product capture is incomplete. As one VP of Surgical Services put it bluntly: "The volume of products that goes unscanned or untracked in every case is disturbing."
The value of complete product visibility
When health systems solve point-of-care capture, the impact extends far beyond cleaner documentation. Perioperative leaders, supply chain managers, and revenue integrity teams stop debating whose data is accurate and start operating from a single, unified source of truth.
Consider Owensboro Health, which set out to eliminate manual documentation friction across its procedural suites. By automating product capture at the point of care, they achieved transformative results across the value chain:
- 48% reduction in monthly expired product costs
- 90%+ reduction in ERP inventory depletion errors
- 12% increase in monthly billable supply revenue
The volume of surgical cases didn't change—what changed was total visibility into every product, tissue, and supply used.
Building a reliable baseline
The operational gap starts and ends at the exact same point: the moment a product is passed to the field. If you capture that moment accurately and effortlessly, your billing workflows, inventory systems, recall tracking, and service line analytics all inherit a dataset they can rely on. If you get it wrong, every team downstream is left spending valuable hours trying to reconcile a version of events nobody is fully sure occurred.
Read the full byline >